| I'm a 42yo online communications & IT consultant, and ex recording artist, from Melbourne, Australia. After much searching, I finally met the right man. Then I got pregnant at 41 - baby boy was due 20 April 2010. It was to be quite a journey. We discovered via ultrasound that our baby had some health problems, namely a hole in the heart, hypospadias and IUG growth issues. Then I became very ill with pre-eclampsia, and was admitted to hospital at 34 weeks gestation. Our baby Charles was delivered prematurely on 16th March 2010 weighing a tiny 1460g (3.5 pounds). He spent a month in hospital before coming home. |
Today, a tooth - tomorrow, the world!
Baby Charles is now 6 months old. That's his real age. In terms of his developmental, or corrected, age, he's just under 5 months old. It's complicated trying to calculate and explain that, every time someone asks - such as the nurses at the local health centre, who need to know the specifics in order to work out whether he is meeting his developmental milestones.
Tuesday, September 14, 2010 | Labels: baby, first tooth, heart, heart surgery, hypospadias, IUGR, premature, VSD | 0 Comments
Cardiologist's Report
Here are some extracts from the cardiologist's report. Am reproducing here as I know many people who have been in similar situations, and who know more about this than I do, have expressed interest.
Foetal echocardiography gave quite good views of the heart. There does appear to be a moderate perimbraneous ventricular septal defect with some outlet septal malalignment producing mild aortic override. This defect appears single. The atrioventricular valves are normally off-set both measuring about 6 to 7mm with normal flow patterns although trivial tricuspid incompetence is present. The aorta arising from predominantly left ventricle measures about 6mm with normal appearing aortic valve. The aortic arch is good size without obvious obstruction. The pulmonary artery can be seen arising from the right ventricle with mild pulmonary valve stenosis, and a pulmonary artery measuring from about 5mm. The branch pulmonary arteries appear normal. I could not be confident about the presence or absence of the duct. Venous return to the atria appears normal.
Thus there appears to be a perimembraneous malaligned ventricular septal defect with some pulmonary stenosis present. This is relatively mild at this moment with good size pulmonary arteries. The foetal cardiac abnormality is unlikely to cause any sign of foetal cardiac compromise. Ventricular septal defects may decrease in size but also pulmonary stenosis may increase during the pregnancy and in the postnatal period.
At birth the cardiac abnormalities may cause symptoms or signs dependent upon the size of the ventricular septal defect and the severity of pulmonary stenosis. If there is little pulmonary stenosis then a moderate ventricular septal defect may produce signs of a significant left to right ventricular shunt. However if there is moderate or more extensive pulmonary stenosis, then the infant is likely to be well but will develop some signs of right to left shunting with time.
Saturday, January 30, 2010 | Labels: cardiologist, CHD, heart, hole in heart, pulmonary valve stenosis, stenosis, ventricular septal defect | 2 Comments
"I believe there's a problem..."
I'm having my usual fortnightly scan (because baby is small - see previous post). I'm at 26 weeks now. I'm here alone - as we thought this scan would be routine, my partner is at work.
Cheerily I ask how much baby boy has grown this past fortnight.
The radiologist is frowning and looking closely at the screen. He focuses in on the heart and looks again.
I lie there and try to keep still. The radiologist enlarges and enlarges, until baby's teeny little heart is maximised across the screen. I see the four chambers of the heart pulsing. From my recollections of school biology classes, it looks like a normal heart. Doesn't it?
The radiologist has switched on the colour part of the ultrasound, which shows blood movement and so on, and I can now see colours moving across the heart.
Finally the radiologist turns to me.
"I believe there is a problem with baby's heart", he says.
OK, keep calm.
"He appears to have a hole in his heart. I'll do you a drawing so I can explain better."
Stay, stay calm. Make sure you take it all in and ask the right questions.
He tells me baby has a medium sized hole between the two lower chambers, and shows me on a drawing, but tells me that he will have to bring in a cardiologist for a specialist opinion.
If confirmed, baby will require heart surgery at some point after his birth.
He also tells me that baby appears to have a condition called Hypospadias, whereby the penis and urethra haven't formed properly and the penis opening is in the wrong position.
This will also require surgery after birth.
I am still trying to be calm, but now I just start sobbing, and have to be taken out to a quiet room to calm down by a clearly upset radiologist, who didn't want to have to tell me this and feels for me.
I'm devastated. My baby, who was so much wanted and so long waited for, is too small, has a heart problem, has a penis problem. What else is coming? My poor little one - what will his first months be like?
And as his mother, what did I do wrong?
Friday, January 29, 2010 | Labels: CHD, heart, heart surgery, hole, hypospadias | 10 Comments